Race Weekend Central

Friday Faceoff: Is 1 Bristol Pavement Race More Prestigious?

Does the prestige of the Bristol Motor Speedway night race increase with just one NASCAR Cup Series race there on pavement per season?

Luken Glover: Would the prestige increase with just the night race? Absolutely. Should it happen? I’m skeptical of that. Bristol is such an exciting track that unless NASCAR wanted to do one event at each venue, there needs to be two races there. Daytona International Speedway, Talladega Superspeedway, Bristol and Charlotte Motor Speedway need two dates. The dirt race still doesn’t feel right, but it does increase the anticipation for the night race. Ultimately, yes, the prestige would increase, but at what cost?

Mark Kristl: Yes. Bristol has one of the few Saturday night races in the Cup Series and it is one worth the anticipation. It culminates four races in three nights at the racetrack. With only one race on the pavement, it gives the Bristol night race a little more prestige. It is the cutoff race for the Cup Round of 16, so desperation for some drivers adds to the potential drama. Hopefully ratings reflect how appreciation for Bristol has grown due to only one race on its pavement.

Taylor Kornhoff: The prestige of the night race will certainly increase with just one event on pavement and will undoubtedly drive up ticket sales, as it is one of NASCAR’s most beloved tracks. That doesn’t mean it should happen, though. Unfortunately, NASCAR loves to take the easy way out and will most likely implement the change, but it should instead work on the short track package and race on Bristol pavement twice a year. Instead of Bristol, it could cut a second date from another track like Richmond Raceway or Phoenix Raceway so that the Cup Series can race on a purpose-built dirt track or add a new venue to the schedule.

Mike Neff: The night race is a crown jewel event of the sport. Whether there is one race or 10 at the track, the night race is still the race that everyone wants to win. The prestige can’t get any higher.

See also
Harrison Burton Learning the Little Things in Growth as a Cup Driver

Will stage break cautions at the Charlotte Motor Speedway ROVAL help or hurt the on-track product?

Neff: I wrote about this in my commentary this week. Stage cautions greatly hamper race strategy. Road course races are more dependent on strategy than any other race. Having planned breaks ruins most of that strategy. Get rid of them.

Kornhoff: There is no problem with the on-track product on road courses. Rewatching old races, there were plenty of road course snooze-fests in previous generations, and just the same, there has been plenty of great road course racing with this car, even on longer runs. There has been a gross overreaction in regard to the road course product that only further proves that we NASCAR fans are spoiled by great racing. Besides, it’s still more entertaining than Formula 1. Stage cautions will not really change anything with respect to the product. It will surely bunch the field back up and create manufactured drama, but it won’t do much more of anything than make the TV partners happy.

Glover: It depends on how you look at it. If you like races built on strategy and seeing who has the absolute best car, stage cautions damage that. If you like drama, close racing and a complete unknown, those odds increase with stage breaks. I applaud NASCAR for wanting to be consistent throughout the playoffs with each race structure, but consistency also isn’t the sport’s theme, exactly. Stage cautions do increase the chances of restart stack-ups. Is that truly what fans want? We’ll find out in a couple of weeks.

Kristl: It will help the on-track product. Look, there still can be some strategy. Come into pit before pit road closes to go with two laps to go in the stage to set yourself up for a better finish at the checkered flag, or stay out to earn stage points. It will also open the possibility of some underdogs either scoring stage points or a good finish, as the playoff drivers likely will be split depending on their position in the point standings.

After finishing 29th in his Cup debut, has Sheldon Creed earned more Cup starts this season?

Kornhoff: The No. 78 Live Fast Motorsports ride has finished no better than 30th in many of the points-paying races run so far in 2023, and in the last 10 races has only finished better than 30th a whopping four times. Though it’s not easy to see, Sheldon Creed in his Cup debut in the No. 78 outdrove his equipment by a mile at Kansas Speedway. He ran a clean race, got a ton of experience and finished above expectations for his car. For him, that might as well be a win. Because of this, Creed definitely deserves more Cup starts, but the Richard Childress Racing No. 33 would suit him far better.

Kristl: Creed brought the racecar home in one piece, but let’s not get ahead of ourselves in terms of his performance. He has zero NASCAR Xfinity Series wins, he’s been outperformed by teammate Austin Hill and still finished 29th in his Cup debut. LFM is one of the bottom-tier teams, but 29th is not a top 10 and no stage points were earned. The team could benefit from having other drivers climb into the No. 78 first before awarding Creed another start.

Neff: Creed is a NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series champion who continues to show his ability to bring cars home in one piece and get the most from them. One race doesn’t really earn or lose other rides for people, but Creed absolutely should get more rides.

Glover: This was definitely a quiet note from the race, but Creed did a solid job. He kept his car clean, nearly completed every lap and finished where the car typically does. Live Fast is building and deserves a lot of credit, but the No. 78 lags behind almost every other car in equipment. Creed did a good job in the car and deserves some future looks.

See also
Truckin' Thursdays: Corey Heim is Latest Driver in Mix for Promotion

Where will Sammy Smith drive in 2024?

Kristl: Sammy Smith should take his funding to Front Row Motorsports No. 38 truck. It’s a proposition out of left field, but just listen. How many outstanding prospects does Ford have in NASCAR? Hailie Deegan has not shined with her results. Cole Custer … we saw how he fared in Cup. Riley Herbst has how many national NASCAR series victories? Meanwhile, in Cup, we do not know how much longer Michael McDowell will continue to race full time, Ryan Preece has not been overly impressive in his first season with Stewart-Haas Racing, and it is unclear whether Harrison Burton will be a long-term fixture in the Wood Brothers Racing No. 21. All this leads me to say Smith should jump into the Truck Series and develop in a way akin to Todd Gilliland. Excel in Trucks, then in a few years elevate into Cup. Chevrolet has many up-and-coming talents, and Toyota does not appear to have many Cup openings in the future.

Glover: It’s hard not to see him running at Joe Gibbs Racing. Smith has struggled the past seven races, but he still has impressed in more ways than one in his rookie season. He also brings the all-important funding with him, but his talent makes him worthy of a ride. Crazier things have unfolded in silly season, but expect Smith back at JGR in 2024.

Neff: Smith has a lot of skill and would be a good addition to any team. He should be back in the No. 18 because that is a championship-caliber team and he is a championship-caliber talent.

Kornhoff: Smith will stay with JGR in the Xfinity Series for 2024. This season saw him juggling racing and high school half of the time and trading paint with John Hunter Nemechek. With Nemecheck gone and some time to place a bigger focus on racing, Smith can come into his own and develop his skills even more in 2024. He showed promise, and of course, grabbed his first win this season, but his later-season blunders are only further evidence that he should stay right where he is. At least for the time being.

About the author

Mark Kristl joined Frontstretch at the beginning of the 2019 NASCAR season. He is the site's ARCA Menards Series editor. Kristl is also an Eagle Scout and a proud University of Dayton alum.

Luken Glover arrived on the Frontstretch scene in 2020. He has been an avid NASCAR fan for the majority of his life, following in the footsteps of his grandfather, who used to help former team owner Junie Donlavey in his garage. Glover covers news for the site and took over "The Underdog House" column in 2021. In addition to being a college junior, his hobbies include volunteering at church, playing basketball and tennis, racing go-karts, and helping at his high school alma mater.

What is it that Mike Neff doesn’t do? The writer, radio contributor and racetrack announcer coordinates the site’s local short track coverage, hitting up Saturday Night Specials across the country while tracking the sport’s future racing stars. The writer for our signature Cup post-race column, Thinkin’ Out Loud (Mondays) also sits down with Cup crew chiefs to talk shop every Friday with Tech Talk. Mike announces several shows each year for the Good Guys Rod and Custom Association. He also pops up everywhere from PRN Pit Reporters and the Press Box with Alan Smothers to SIRIUS XM Radio. He has announced at tracks all over the Southeast, starting at Millbridge Speedway. He's also announced at East Lincoln Speedway, Concord Speedway, Tri-County Speedway, Caraway Speedway, and Charlotte Motor Speedway.

Sign up for the Frontstretch Newsletter

A daily email update (Monday through Friday) providing racing news, commentary, features, and information from Frontstretch.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Dirt at Bristol was a cute gimmick, but has worn out it’s welcome. If they want dirt, go to a real dirt track. With so few short tracks, let bristol be Bristol.


My view may be a minority one, but as tough as Cup races are to win, they are all special.
And Harrison Burton is a waste of a good race car.


Bristol has lost its prestige ever since they screwed with the track many years ago. It was a fan favorite and now seems to be less so based on attendance and perception of attendance on TV.
All the talk about Bristol seems to be coming from a historical perspective now instead of what the reality is this decade.
It is still a decent race but lately it has proven out not to be the Bristol of generations past.


The current Bristol is like the New Coca Cola – everybody hates it. Difference is, Coca Cola wisely listened to their customer base and went back to making what everyone likes. NA$CAR has instead decided to take a formula their customers already dislike and keep adding stuff to it thinking eventually they’ll make the product palatable once again. They have the recipe, but refuse to give their customer base what they want.


So true.


I look at stage breaks as competition yellows. I don’t watch the first two stages because it really doesn’t mean a whole lot to the viewer. Sure, there’s a few points that matter in the big scheme, but enjoying a race I’m only interested in who is leading on the last lap. Don’t try and use the stages as a fix car issues where the leader in clean air has such a big advantage. If that’s the case then let’s have cautions every 30 laps so we can all bunch up again. The Roval is a road course. Keep the road course rules with no stages.


Or they could put the “roval”events back on the ovals and have road course events on actual road courses instead of another gimmick.

Share via