Once upon a time, short tracks reigned supreme in NASCAR.
As the racecars became more aerodynamically dependent and clean air ruled the roost, fans looked to the short tracks to provide more authentic racing. Tracks of a mile or more, with a few exceptions, had become predictable at best. From the late fourth-generation car through the Car of Tomorrow and Gen Six, passing was a rarity, particularly at the 1.5- to two-mile tracks that had slowly taken over the bulk of the schedule. The winners’ pool was shallow with the bulk of the wins going to a small handful of drivers whose teams had money to burn.
But there was some relief. Daytona International Speedway and Talladega Superspeedway, of course, brought chaos and crashing, but for fans of old-school racing, there was another group of tracks that kept racing at the forefront: the short tracks.
Once a staple of the sport, by the 2000s, short tracks in the NASCAR Cup Series were reduced to just three: Martinsville Speedway, a part of NASCAR since the beginning in 1949; Bristol Motor Speedway, where cages were rattled and tempers raised; and Richmond Raceway, which at three-quarters of a mile wasn’t really a short track, but raced more like one than the intermediate track it really was (NASCAR has since changed its track definitions to include any track under a mile).
Fans pleaded for more short tracks on the schedule even as they watched North Wilkesboro Speedway slowly sink back into the green foothills and heard rumors of even Martinsville losing a race to someplace like Kentucky Speedway or Las Vegas Motor Speedway.
NASCAR…didn’t really listen, though the Cup Series schedule saw a few intermediates lose dates to road courses and even other intermediates. Atlanta Motor Speedway got reconfigured into a drafting-style racetrack. The resurrection of North Wilkesboro brought the All-Star event to a short track, but the track has not seemed to get any serious consideration for a points race for the Cup Series
Then along came the Next Gen racecar and turned NASCAR on its head.
Suddenly, the intermediate tracks were hosting races with door-to-door finishes. Kansas Speedway became a fan favorite. Homestead-Miami Speedway regained favor with viewers. Darlington was The Lady in Black again. It almost seemed too good to be true, especially in the Next Gen’s early days before even the big teams had a consistent handle on it.
And indeed, it was too good to be true.
As if NASCAR had sold its soul for the intermediates, the short tracks (and the one-milers and road courses) suffered. Races became lackluster, with drivers running away from the field and nobody able to do anything with the leaders.
Bristol, which had already changed after a repave and reconfiguration altered the surface in an attempt to create a second racing groove, no longer featured flaring tempers and drivers rooting one another out of the way. The rattle of cages is rarely heard anymore. Martinsville has suffered even more, with chasers unable to track down the leader throughout a race. Slightly faster Richmond fell flat too.
The All-Star Race, which should be NASCAR’s finest moment at a track back from the dead, is perhaps a little better because of the format, but it too, suffers.Â
As the luster wears off the Next Gen as the biggest teams inevitably pull away from the field, there is no longer solace in the tracks that represent the very roots of the sport.
Something needs to change, or fans will be clamoring to drop the sport’s strongest connection to its past, to the great drivers and rivalries that brought fans in to start with.
It could take a radical departure from NASCAR’s current philosophy. The Next Gen car and rules restricting teams from having dozens of cars at the ready are designed to save teams money and create parity, widening the number of teams capable of winning. To a degree, it has done that.
In doing so, however, it has become apparent that NASCAR needs a whole other approach to short-track racing: a purpose-built racecar and engine package.
Prior to the Car of Tomorrow, teams built chassis for specific tracks, mainly superspeedways, road courses and short tracks. Not only was that expensive (though road course cars, in particular, had a long shelf life), but it required teams to have more employees to build and work on them so multiple cars could be prepared at once for upcoming weeks.
It doesn’t need to go that far, and it shouldn’t, but it’s going to take more than the handful of tweaks NASCAR has tried so far. True short-track chassis need to be a thing.
To go with cars designed for shorter tracks, there needs to be horsepower. In reality, simply giving the cars an additional 200 horsepower would probably improve the racing at all tracks of a mile or less and road courses drastically. Pairing that with a dedicated short-track package for flat miles and short tracks has the potential to create a breed of racing that fans circle on their calendars and which fans talk about for years, even decades.
Which, by the way, is how you get new fans.
Applied to the schedule right now, a new car/engine package could be used at Martinsville, Bristol, Richmond and North Wilkesboro, but also at Phoenix Raceway and New Hampshire Motor Speedway with the higher-power engine in play for Dover Motor Speedway Speedway as well as the road courses.
Ten races are over a quarter of the season, which makes a dedicated car much more practical than it was for just the two road courses that teams used to build them for. Longtime fans remember the days when teams used two different engines every single week—sprinkling them throughout the season as was done a few years ago is far less daunting and less expensive.
The sport has changed drastically in the 21st century. It has become clear that one car is not going to create great racing at every type of track on the schedule. (Look at the NASCAR Xfinity Series cars, for another example—they put on a better short-track race than the Cup cars but suffer on the intermediates.)
The solution is a second package that’s as similar in outward appearance as possible (if teams could use the same body pieces, that’s even better) but under the hood is built for a different kind of racing. It could further be refined for different tracks with tire compounds and options and giving teams some more suspension options.
But something needs to change before the last of the tracks that build NASCAR fade into history forever.
Amy is an 20-year veteran NASCAR writer and a six-time National Motorsports Press Association (NMPA) writing award winner, including first place awards for both columns and race coverage. As well as serving as Photo Editor, Amy writes The Big 6 (Mondays) after every NASCAR Cup Series race. She can also be found working on her bi-weekly columns Holding A Pretty Wheel (Tuesdays) and Only Yesterday (Wednesdays). A New Hampshire native whose heart is in North Carolina, Amy’s work credits have extended everywhere from driver Kenny Wallace’s website to Athlon Sports. She can also be heard weekly as a panelist on the Hard Left Turn podcast that can be found on AccessWDUN.com's Around the Track page.



Dream on!!!!!
Yup. Not gonna happen. This is NASCAR we’re talking about here
I agree the car is a problem on short tracks, though I’d argue all three tracks present slightly different problems. 100% agree that more HP would help, though at least two of the tracks have bigger issues. I don’t generally see eye to eye with many NASCAR fans, who complain about anything and everything, hearkening back to “the good old days”, forgetting that Waltrip had a knack for lapping the field at Bristol, but the fact remains…all three short tracks are broken, to varying degrees.
Worsening all three, stage racing also has an outsized impact here…seldom does anyone have to strategize. Just run to the end of the stage, and generally have one (or zero) green flag stops throughout the whole race. Tires usually don’t matter. Fuel doesn’t matter. Just mash the gas and abuse the tires as much as you like.
Martinsville – I think the car is the primary problem. The track configuration is still great.
Bristol – The car is a problem, but Bristol has been ruined since the banking was changed. This should have remained a single groove track, with 400-500 laps of everyone fighting for the bottom. Until or unless it is returned to this, the racing will suffer, no matter the car. A half mile does not lend itself to exciting racing when better cars can do whatever they please, choosing amongst multiple grooves.
Richmond – I cannot recall a time this track was consistently exciting, unless you count the old fairgrounds 1/2 mile. There have been a few races which were memorable despite the track, but none because of the track. The current iteration generally results in a dominant car running away from the field. This has been a problem since well before the next gen or COT cars. I don’t really consider this a short track. There is generally very little close racing, which means there’s also less friction between drivers.
NASCAR didn’t listen. Nope they did not and on top of that many in the media were openly hostile and abusive to any fan who dared to speak up about not liking the changes. So a lot of fans voted by no longer going to races. I used to schedule my weekend around the racing but no more. I still watch but not entire races.
we went to Bristol before the CoT and the track reconfigure. Had a great time and completely understood why it was so hard to get a ticket. Now people dont show up and NASCAR and tv partners have only themselves to blame
Get rid of stage racing and “overtimes” and bring more short tracks. How many times has a so-called overtime race robbed the real winner of a checkered flag?
There’s too much money into this car for NASCAR to start developing a new one now. Maybe there are some small parts that can be changed rather than throwing the whole thing out so the teams don’t have to buy a whole new fleet so soon. If they refuse to budge on horsepower, maybe they can just make the brakes smaller. Older cars had much less powerful engines and didn’t go nearly as fast but needed longer braking zones because the brakes were so weak. More braking means more potential passes. With smaller brakes they can go back to 15″ rims, not to mention 5 lug nuts and stop this plague of wheels falling off every week. Also get rid of 5th gear- shifting on a short track is stupid.
I don’t more horsepower is the magic touch to help. To me the real problem is the rear diffuser on the short tracks. It causes a lot of dirty air because I feel the cars don’t go fast enough on short tracks to be effective. If NASCAR tells teams to remove it, I bet that will fix at least 70% of the problems, maybe 80%. Plus it should be relatively easy since the underbody is bolted on to the bottom of the chassis.
The main problem with the car is that the drivers cannot adjust it the way they want to. NA$CAR says, “Here is the car. Make it work!”