In case you haven’t heard, what’s old is new again. Collectors are clamoring for VHS cassettes, pop hits are sampling Elton John tunes and a band shirt you had in 1994 could be worth more than one you bought last week.
This appears to also be the case with the NASCAR championship. After more than two decades of various playoff systems, it sounds like we could be headed back to the future, with a full season points format gaining momentum as a distinct possibility.
Proponents claim that it will lessen the likelihood that an undeserving driver will wind up hoisting the big trophy. After all, while each of the three national touring series has its season win leader still in the hunt on the final weekend, it could easily come to pass that none of them win the title. One might consider that a travesty, but such an occurrence is most certainly not limited to the playoff era of NASCAR.
Not by a long shot.
Now, we have mentioned these situations in the Cup Series before. For example, Bill Elliott coughed up a championship lead in 1985, letting an 11-win season morph into Darrell Waltrip‘s third series crown, even though Waltrip won just three races.
But there have been many more years with similar outcomes, as Jeff Gordon could tell you. From a statistical perspective, his 2007 season was one of the best of his legendary career. But fellow Hendrick Motorsports star Jimmie Johnson was on another level in the playoffs during that era and he stole what would have been Gordon’s fifth championship.
However, even in a full-season format, Gordon had one pulled out from under him by a teammate. In 1996, Gordon racked up 10 wins, his first of three straight years with double-digit victories. His final win of the year, the last Cup points race at North Wilkesboro Speedway until 2025, gave him a 111-point lead with four races to go.
It only took Terry Labonte one afternoon to erase nearly the entire advantage. While Gordon’s car was stricken with mechanical trouble at Charlotte, Labonte marched to his second win of the season. That win, coupled with Gordon’s 31st place finish, moved Labonte to just a single point behind Gordon.
Labonte finished higher than Gordon in each of the next two races, leaving him only needing to come in eighth or better to clinch the title. Labonte wound up fifth in the finale at Atlanta Motor Speedway, leaving Gordon with his 10 race trophies but not a championship one.
Gordon wasn’t the only big winner to miss out on the biggest prize in 1996. As he had the previous season, Mike Skinner collected eight Craftsman Truck Series wins that year. Although 1995 ended with the series title, eight would not be enough wins for a repeat performance in ’96.
However, unlike Gordon, Skinner spent the majority of the year as pursuer rather than being pursued. The consistency of Ron Hornaday Jr., his championship rival, was suffocating to Skinner’s championship hopes. Hornaday finished eighth or better in each of the first 19 races that year. A 22nd-place result at North Wilkesboro (the same weekend as Gordon’s 10th Cup win) was Hornaday’s only finish outside of the top 10, and he wrapped up the championship in the final event of the year at Las Vegas Motor Speedway.
With a points system that doesn’t reset for a playoff-type format, it is consistency that most often is rewarded. In the current winner-take-all version, it’s less about the quantity of a driver’s wins and more important for a win to come at the right time. For all of the championship hopefuls, the right time is this weekend at Phoenix Raceway.
Denny Hamlin, Connor Zilisch and Corey Heim may have each won the most races this year in their respective series, but they would likely agree that their most important victory is the next one. Otherwise, they too might end up as yet another driver to win the most battles without winning the proverbial war.
Frank Velat has been an avid follower of NASCAR and other motorsports for over 30 years. He brings a blend of passionate fan and objective author to his work. Frank offers unique perspectives that everyone can relate to, remembering the sport's past all the while embracing its future.
Follow along with @FrankVelat on Twitter.




“With a points system that doesn’t reset for a playoff-type format, it is consistency that most often is rewarded.” That is true with the Latford points system but it doesn’t have to be. NASCAR can devise a full season points system that rewards winning more than the Latford system did.
I was thinking the same thing. They need to reward more points for victories so that they mean something. Under the Latford, finishing 2nd wasn’t much different than winning, so there was no real incentive to try to win, other than hosting the trophy.
Of course people have been saying that for years. Maybe now Nascar will finally listen. With the parity that there is in Cup now, I firmly believe we can have a quality championship fight using a season long points system if done correctly.
Completely agree. If they want to keep the current system where last place gets one point, and the points go up by one per position, add additional gaps once you get to the top ten.
Off the top of my head, first gets ten more than second, second gets five more than third, third gets three more than fourth, then two point gaps from fourth to tenth. Incentivize going for the win, but somewhat remove the compulsion for “checkers or wreckers” we see all too often.
They could even go 15 or 20 as the gap from first to second, without most races devolving into clown shoes near the end, while eventually crowning a deserving season champion.
The best team doesn’t always win.
And it shouldn’t?
Sure there’s the odd ball instance, but I’d rather have the team that worked it’s butt off week in and week out win than some lucky run by a less than deserving one.
This Playoff format, devised by some goof ball, lends itself to just this type of outcome.
And Connor Zilich is better now, than half the current Cup Drivers are. There is hope for the sport yet!