Dropping the Hammer: Steve O’Donnell Changes His Tune

Over the years, new NASCAR President Steve O’Donnell has become kind of a meme.

Not him, exactly. Just the things he says.

OK, the one thing. You know what it is.

“We like what we’re seeing.”

Whether he said it just once, twice or 50 times, be it in an appearance on SiriusXM NASCAR Radio or in a press conference, it’s the quote that has become synonymous with O’Donnell.

It’s basically the equivalent of the cartoon where a dog is sitting in a burning room and nonchalantly says, “This is fine.” Or the scene from the original version of The Naked Gun movie of Frank Drebin telling people, “There’s nothing to see here. Please disperse,” as a building explodes behind him.

In the NASCAR fandom, the quote has become a catch-all.

Anytime a NASCAR executive — O’Donnell or otherwise — made a positive comment regarding the racing product, the playoffs, the Next Gen car or some other topic, despite all evidence to the contrary?

“We like what we’re seeing.”

On Oct. 8, the messaging coming from O’Donnell … changed a little bit.

The NASCAR president appeared on the Dale Jr. Download to make a big announcement. Or whatever adjective is appropriate to describe a change of 80 horsepower.

That’s how much NASCAR will be increasing horsepower levels in the NASCAR Cup Series in 2026 at all racetracks shorter than 1.5 miles and road courses. That’s an increase from 670 hp to 750 hp.

Fans and drivers have been banging that drum for years, and they’re finally getting their wish.

Will it actually provide a noticeable improvement to the racing product? Who knows!

But the most interesting thing to me about O’Donnell’s appearance on the DJD wasn’t about the horsepower and the thinking that went into the decision. It’s what O’Donnell said about the current playoff format, which has been the clearest sign yet that changes are coming next year.

In short, O’Donnell shared the opinion that he viewed the format as having stunted the sport’s ability to create star power of its ranks of drivers.

He used Joe Gibbs Racing’s Christopher Bell to frame his thinking.

“Here’s where I’m at, first off,” O’Donnell said. “We got rules in place for this year. What I don’t want to do is take away from whoever wins the championship this year. Those were the rules. Everybody knew them. Let’s go race. And whoever wins that championship, I’m going to stand behind that driver and team and say, ‘that’s our champion.’

“Having said that, what gets me to think about it is Christopher Bell.”

O’Donnell touted Bell as someone who will have conversations with him behind closed doors and share his “honest opinion” about things like the playoffs and not broadcast those discussions on social media.

And Bell’s opinion about the playoffs is one “which I agree with,” O’Donnell said, before sharing what Bell had discussed with him.

“Hey, man, if I roll off 10 wins in a year and I go to one race and a couple other guys get into me or whatever, I’m not the champion. … [What if] four years in a row that happens? I don’t want the next Christopher Bell, who’s 10 years old right now, thinking about NASCAR, wanting to go to NASCAR, wanting to be a champion and say[ing], ‘huh, this is a little bit more of a chance on one race, right?’

“I also look at it like, Christopher Bell to me is a superstar in our sport. You roll off four championships in a row with eight wins and a body of work, whatever that may be, that’s good for our sport. People are talking about him.”

O’Donnell then brought up the Daytona 500. He insinuated that he believed the playoffs have devalued the biggest race in NASCAR on some level.

“I think about how big that race is,” he said. “And one of the narratives [is], ‘oh, he’s in the playoffs.’ Man, it’s the Daytona 500, right?”

However, O’Donnell said he would “argue until I’m blue in the face” that the racing has changed for the better due to the emphasis place on winning and there are aspects of that he doesn’t want to see go away.

O’Donnell also acknowledged the format was put in place to attract “new fans, but you can’t do that at the expense of kind of where your existing fans are.”

“That to me is part of the conversation, too, of thinking you can do some things that may bring in new folks,” he added. “But when I say being authentic, be authentic with who you are and those fans will come, and newer fans will come.”

Does O’Donnell feel more at liberty to share feel true opinions on matters now that he’s president of NASCAR? Or has the bottoming out of TV ratings during the playoffs escalated things to the point where NASCAR can’t help but acknowledge things have gotten out of hand?

Either way, it’s better than having to sit through another “we like what we’re seeing” interview.

A name and email address are required to post a comment. The email address is not publicly visible or shared. Please keep in mind that comments are moderated according to our comment policy.

Comments are listed in order from oldest to newest. Leave a comment

6 thoughts on “Dropping the Hammer: Steve O’Donnell Changes His Tune”

  1. It seems that rather than the moderate gains or losses in ratings over the past few years, ratings are falling off a cliff. It’s logical this would motivate NASCAR to begin taking complaints seriously, though as noted here and elsewhere, the warning signs were present and should have been heeded before losing 20%+ of your viewership.

    A total guess here, but I think this is what has happened:

    NASCAR chased new fans, and was successful in doing so.

    In chasing new fans, NASCAR alienated many older fans.

    NASCAR was unable to provide a product good enough to hold the new fans interest, and the lost older fans have not returned.

    At the end of the day, NASCAR needs to attract new fans, as the old fan base is aging, and either dying off, or reaching ages which are not appealing to advertisers.

    I think the largest mistake was trying to inject excitement via rules and decisions which made the rules opaque to the casual fan, and both arbitrary and annoying to the old fan base. They cheapened their own product.

    • They need to attract new fans who stay on as fans. How many “fans” have streamed for five minutes and never gone back?

  2. Couple of points. First of all, everyone wanted more emphasis on winning, but ‘win and you’re in’ is too extreme. It went too far. Win the Daytona 500 and you’re locked in, and the racing season has just begun. Definitely changes your motivation for the rest of the year. Awarding a much higher percentage of points for a win would make more sense. A win would be rewarded, but not lock you in. Second, if you don’t have some kind of reset later in the season, the points more than likely won’t be close, and it will be very anticlimactic and fans will lose interest. That’s just common sense. Maybe reset the points, making them tighter, with five or ten races to go, and then race to the end to determine the champion.

    • We almost always have 12 more more winners each year. Drop the playoffs to 12 drivers, and the fluke winners suddenly don’t get in by the skin of their teeth anymore.

  3. I have recently been seeing veteran drivers speaking out against win and you’re in. Where the heck have you been for all these years

    • They have been toeing the company line to avoid a penalty for actions detrimental. We’ll never know what they were told after they said it.

Comments are closed.