Race Weekend Central

IndyCar Is Edging Toward Staleness

After a season of positive momentum and foundation building that resulted in increased metrics for television and at-track spectator viewing, the NTT IndyCar Series season has hit a slight bump even before rolling over to 2024.

With the recent news that the new hybrid engine formula on which the series was heavily relying to kickoff their continued rise for next year is delayed, IndyCar is now edging closer to something no sport wants.


And IndyCar has a history of flirting with staleness.

It’s been covered by multiple outlets, all questioning whether the series is making the right strategic decision in moving forward with the Dallara DW12 chassis in parallel with the new engine formula. Leadership is taking a patient approach, introducing new technology and additional cost, via testing and components, on the teams in a dedicated manner. The business approach in that doesn’t seem too perplexing or questionable. After all, IndyCar isn’t ripe with the millions of dollars that other racing series like NASCAR and Formula 1 attract nor does it pull in the monster television revenue. The paddock is full of owners who are in this because they have a great passion for racing, not to make a fortune off selling their assets in exchange for a driver to put on track.

Still, the teams need to at least stay in the black to continue operation.

Is it good for the series, though, to have put focus on the engine and relegate a new car design to later?

Let’s see what the TV viewership says at St. Pete. Rather than touting the introduction of a new engine formula, and no new car look, the series is rolling into the season opener in March exactly the same way they did in 2023. The drivers will have their storylines: Will Alex Palou repeat? Does Josef Newgarden defend his Indianapolis 500 win? Which driver out of the crop of rookies jumps out? Does Palou spend a third consecutive season in as many court rooms as victory lanes?

See also
2023 Top NASCAR Storylines: The Biggest Stories of the Craftsman Truck Series Season

Now look at the sports landscape across the nation and see what IndyCar’s professional, major league brethren are doing.

In the NBA, commissioner Adam Silver introduced the new in-season tournament, an idea plucked from the European formula used in both soccer (sorry, football) and the Euroleague. Regardless of the skeptics among the crowd that said it wouldn’t do anything for the sport (like this dude behind the keyboard), it’s proven to be a massive hit for the fans and has injected great energy and vibes into the early season.

The NFL recently added an additional game to their schedule in the last few years, bumping up the number of you-should-care games in a season to 17. They also changed how many teams could make the playoffs, which increased that total by two. Know what that ends up selling? More storylines and hope to a fan base that can’t get enough of the biggest sport in the country.

But those are stick and ball sports, what does it matter what they do compared to motorsport?

In the IMSA series, the preeminent sports car series in the nation (and covered fantastically by our own Phil Allaway), the leadership introduced the new GTP class last year and, heading into the 24 Hours of Daytona, have 10 full-time cars expected in the top-tier class. That included four different manufacturers, with two more possible in the future. There’s a lot of freshness in that paddock.

The other two major series in the country, NASCAR and F1, epitomize the capability in bringing ‘new hotness’ into their seasons. It goes without saying that the folks at F1, and their massive budget, are at the top of their game in introducing bold new parts, pieces and designs each year. NASCAR just recently launched a new car and continually tinkers with their racing product and schedule to ensure there is plenty to talk about in between events or seasons.

Then there is IndyCar. The current aero package was launched in 2018, but it was built on the spec safety cell chassis that hit the track in 2012 and was spearheaded two chief executives ago. This DW12 has had three different aero kits built around it, and has been on track longer than the IR03 Dallara which started in 2003 and was considered long in the tooth when the decision was made in 2011 for a new ride. The engine formula has basically been the same since 2012 as well, except for early changes to Honda’s turbocharger configuration.

Know what else hasn’t changed in that time frame? The addition of a third engine manufacturer, massive amounts of horsepower like in CART’s heyday, and a new car designed for the future.

Now that the hybrid engine is delayed so is the series’ attempt to inject new technology into the paddock and put them on the cutting edge of racing innovation. Instead, IndyCar has to triumph more about the close racing product and accessible drivers – which are absolutely critical for the series’ identity. But where is the next quest for freshness and change that will introduce more stories? The new video game? Delayed, for who knows how long? How about a new race at Thermal Club? That will cost you $2,000 for the VIP package, which now the series admits was poorly communicated when announced. A new engine that produces a ridiculous amount of horsepower? Even when it hits the track, early reports say that the weight is going to slow the cars down and possibly eradicate any gains.

The impact of this forced delay – which is no doubt legitimate for fairness in the paddock – will effect the forthcoming racing product. With the added horsepower from the energy recovery system, the series was moving towards improving the package at the famed Indy 500, where cars have been limited in being able to move through traffic. Putting the strategy in the hands of the drivers was going to provide an additional aspect to follow during all racing.

Props to IndyCar though for making this tough call. If the parts aren’t ready and there isn’t enough for the full field to test before the St. Pete, then this is the best decision for the competition. However it doesn’t make it less frustrating that it’s happened.

With 2024 closing in quickly, it looks like IndyCar is already starting their season over a bump, but hopefully they pick up momentum right where they left off this year.  

About the author

Tom Blackburn

Tom is an IndyCar writer at Frontstretch, joining in March 2023. Besides writing the IndyCar Previews and the occasional Inside Indycar, he will hop on as a fill-in guest on the Open Wheel podcast The Pit Straight. His full-time job is with the Department of Veterans Affairs History Office and is a lieutenant colonel in the Army National Guard. After graduating from Purdue University with a Creative Writing degree, he was commissioned in the Army and served a 15-month deployment as a tank platoon leader with the 3d ACR in Mosul, Iraq. A native Hoosier, he calls Fort Wayne home. Follow Tom on Twitter @TomBlackburn42.

Sign up for the Frontstretch Newsletter

A daily email update (Monday through Friday) providing racing news, commentary, features, and information from Frontstretch.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Technically Indycar has been stale for years.


It’s the best racing. Outside of Rolex24, IMSA is really not that big. NASCAR remains consistent. F1 is a bubble in the US. 5 years top. People will lose interest. Indycar will remain third tier – next to F1, NASCAR.


Since I made no comment on the racing itself, your post is nonsensical

WJW Motorsports

A racing series is not akin to a loaf of bread.

Now that the hybrid engine is delayed so is the series’ attempt to inject new technology into the paddock and put them on the cutting edge of racing innovation. Instead, IndyCar has to triumph more about the close racing product and accessible drivers.”

Poor ole Indy only has good racing and good drivers to boast about… imagine that problem! “New technology” is just thin code for going electric and eliminating gas engines – thus all politics. I doubt I’ll be watching the various golf cart series when they’ve all arrived – but they will come soon enough. Let’s just enjoy the good racing in Indy we have now, and worry about messing it up later shall we? (after all – a bunch of wealthy owners are just having fun – F Honda if it doesn’t want to build gas engines anymore). Stick and ball is simply a vehicle for gambling now – it understands it too is doomed if it doesn’t find a new addictive hook for the stare at their phones 24 hours a day and believe whatever it tells them generation. All stick and ball traditionalists loathe their formerly beloved sports now too.


The 2023 F1 season saw one team win 21 of 22 races. If Indycar is stale, then F1 is fermented garbage.


Exactly. It’s just one guys opinion F1 is as boring as watching bread bake NASCAR isn’t much better

Kevin Allen

I’ll keep this simple. Although I know this will never fly, here it goes. Huge race fan, have followed F1, Indy/Cart, IMSA, Lemans for over 30 years. Indy can take advantage of the one thing F1 fans miss dearly – the lighter more nimble cars of 10-20 years ago with screaming V8-10-12s. If Indy had any imagination, it would bring back high revving fuel efficient V8s, allow the teams some leeway on aero and lose the ridiculous windshield. Go with the F1 halo if necessary but the windshield just looks stupid. Witness ANY race today and the one thing that gets fan attention are high revving engines without electrification. I personally was there for Porsche’s 911 GT3 R reveal at Rennsport at Laguna Seca this past summer. A naturally aspirated motor that sent fans running to the fences for a glimpse whenever it went by. The sounds and smells of racing make it an integral part of this great sport. It’s time for bold moves from Indy or Tom is right, the staleness will take over, excitement will wane and so will the crowds, myself included.


While I agree the looks of the windscreen are not good, I do believe it has saved some driver’s lives (and at least extended careers for others) so I’m not as critical of that nor the F1 halo. Is it my favorite style? No, but I’d rather have it than the alternative (severe head injuries).

In the last few years, between F1, NASCAR, and Indycar, my opinion is Indycar has put the best racing product on the track (even with crusty, rusty, stale, old cars) as well as in the broadcast. IMSA – when I watch it – is usually a good show. I’d put IMSA a close second on my list for racing entertainment value. NASCAR is all about gimmicks and TV tomfoolery these days, and F1 is obviously all about who has the best car – while the tech is amazing, not exactly that much fun to watch (again, my opinion).

One thing I’d like to change about Indycar, the “push to pass” feature should be secret to each team. Everyone still gets the same amount, but how much any car has is kept secret from other teams. I don’t like the lead car with 5 or 10 laps to go knowing he has more push to pass than the other 2 podium drivers (or vice-versa). I think (as a viewer/fan) the unknown is more interesting and exciting than the known near the end of the race – especially if the front runners are close.

Share via