Who… gets my shoutout of the race?
One of the cool things about superspeedway racing is that restrictor plates allow the cream to rise to the top when it comes to driving skill. Yes, plate racing is a skill, and sometimes drivers who struggle at other tracks shine at these events, and vice versa (yeah, you, Jimmie Johnson).
A confident driver can make bold, aggressive moves and make them work, which is what Kasey Kahne did Saturday night. His reward? Nearly an upset win in the process. Leavine Family Racing doesn’t have the resources to run up front most weeks, but Kahne showed that he can get it done when his No. 95 car can match the field. Plus, he was fun to watch as he worked past all his rivals at the front. It was a solid reminder that lack of money does not equal lack of talent in the driver’s seat.
What… is the takeaway from this weekend?
Restrictor plate racing is its own animal, and it’s a hard one to police. That was on display in Daytona thanks to a couple of close calls, one of which opens up a Pandora’s box for the sanctioning body.
It was the call that ended the NASCAR XFINITY Series race that’s still left everyone talking, and all it does is open the door for more questions. The rule is crystal clear: a driver cannot advance his position by driving below the double yellow inside line. It’s a rule that was instituted a couple decades ago at the request of drivers to stop the practice of racing on the apron through the straightaways. People would do that, then try to blend into traffic in the corners, which caused as many wrecks as it sounds like it would.
What was less clear Friday night (July 6) was whether Justin Haley advanced his position below the line as NASCAR said. Haley had the nose of his car ahead of both Kyle Larson and Elliott Sadler when his left wheels rolled below the left-hand line, which is how NASCAR defines the violation. NASCAR said he was still advancing his position… but was he?
Sure, Haley might have gained more ground down there, but it’s hard to advance when you’re already the race leader. He had not cleared Larson and Sadler yet, but at plate tracks, it’s not uncommon for the leader to be running side-by-side with other cars. Just look at the finish. Larson was anything but clear of Sadler, though he was ahead of him.
Hence the questions. It has nothing to do with it being the last lap of the race and everything to do with where Haley was on track at the time. Since Haley had the car in front and could, therefore, not advance his position, what happens now? Will the race leader be penalized if he dips down there for a split second, perhaps to pass a lapped car or avoid a piece of debris? Or maybe just because it’s a long race, he had a momentary lapse and gains a fraction over second place?
That’s the Pandora’s Box NASCAR appeared to open Friday. Perhaps that example is an exaggeration, but how, exactly, is it different?
There’s also a bigger issue here than whether NASCAR missed a call.
It’s hard to take the rules seriously when NASCAR will take a win away from a driver for a questionable yellow-line violation but not for failing post-race inspection. A team could build in adjustments that will take the car well out of tolerance during the race, building an advantage on the field. But while they’d lose points and the ability to use a win for the playoffs, they keep that win in the record books as well as the trophy. Yet dip a tire below a line for a split second? That victory goes up in smoke. A mistake costs you a win but a deliberate violation of rules doesn’t.
How can NASCAR justify that to fans? New ones are critical to the long-term health of the sport. But this disparity in the rules is confusing to longtime fans, let alone those just learning about stock car racing.
Where… did Erik Jones come from?
One thing that is appealing about plate racing is that drivers can come from the back of the pack to the front if they have a car that’s handling well and the driver is skilled enough in the draft. Not one of the top-seven finishers, including Jones, started inside the top 10, and Jones came from the 29th starting spot. He avoided major damage in several multi-car crashes to win for the first time in his career on a superspeedway as well as the first time in his Cup career.
It was a bittersweet moment for Jones in that his father, who passed away from cancer two years ago, wasn’t there to witness the moment. But he was quick to credit the man who had helped him start his racing career in post-race interviews. Sophomore driver Jones, who competes for Joe Gibbs Racing, after running his rookie season for Furniture Row Racing, won the Truck Series title at the age of 19. It seems that at 22, he’s got many years ahead of him. Jones has come close to winning on several occasions, but this weekend, he got it done.
When… was the moment of truth?
Good old plate track racing was on display Saturday night, and some of it went very right. At one point, there were several groups of cars on track. One could run another down if they lined up right, but the huge pack was broken up some. However, as is usually the case at Daytona and Talladega, a lot went wrong as well. That included several multi-car crashes, which have become all but inevitable. One involved, to one degree or another, over 25 cars.
Can NASCAR do anything about it? And do most fans really want them to?
The logical solution would be to go to a smaller engine for the plate tracks so that it could run unrestricted at safe speeds. But that would be a huge expense for teams. The last time NASCAR ran a test without plates, lap speeds hovered around 240 mph. That’s far too fast to be safe.
But a lot of fans love the brand of racing at Daytona and Talladega because the finishes are close and the threat of carnage is constant. The crashes are part of the thrill for many, probably for more than will ever admit it. Is there a reason to change things?
Is it real racing? Answers will vary from both extremes here. There are those who’d prefer the races look like they did from the days before restrictor plates closed the field up, even if that meant one or two drivers dominating. Then, there are those who love the idea of the field under a blanket. Driving plate cars is a skill that some have more of than others, just like racing anywhere else. But some of the best are a bit unexpected which adds a new element to these races, a positive for a sport looking for parity.
For now, what we saw at Daytona was typical superspeedway fare. Whether it tastes good is up for debate.
Why… didn’t defending race winner Ricky Stenhouse Jr. pull it off?
The short answer: he was too busy wrecking. Stenhouse instigated at least one incident, got caught in three more plus a spin on his own and still managed to finish the race, albeit a lap down. Stenhouse proved last season that he can race with the best of them at Daytona and Talladega. However, he’s also shown throughout his career he’s a loose cannon. The latter was the Stenhouse who showed up Saturday night.
GABLE: STENHOUSE GOES FROM HERO TO ZERO AT DAYTONA
Stenhouse won the first two stages, so he did a lot right. He was also involved in triggering two major incidents, including a 26-car pileup. His blame for that one is a little misguided. While he did get into Brad Keselowski to set off the melee, Keselowski had checked up a fraction to avoid running into William Byron, who was leading and threw a rather questionable block at the No. 2. It was that rookie mistake more than Stenhouse’s chain reaction that caused the carnage.
He did trigger the next one, though, turning Kyle Busch and collecting Byron and several others. Stenhouse more or less survived the race, finishing 17th.
How well he came through the aftermath of angry drivers might be another story.
How… much should NASCAR micromanage races?
Saturday night’s close call, a violation to Jimmie Johnson for pitting outside the box, was clear cut and the right call by NASCAR officials. Johnson’s front bumper was maybe a foot over the line before the fueler disengaged the can. Frustration for the team stemmed from the fact it happened a lot faster than the video fans saw on TV. It’s a mistake of a fraction of a second that cost Johnson the best shot he’s had at a win in more than a year. Micromanaging by NASCAR? Definitely. But there was a violation, even if it was a few inches and a fraction of a second.
On the other hand, would the same violation even have been seen by a live official instead of a computer? Other than NASCAR cutting costs, has the switch from human officials on pit road making these calls helped the sport?
The human element has been largely removed from NASCAR, from computerized inspection and officiating to cutting teams’ personnel and taking away the choices that teams once were able to use to separate themselves from the pack. For every rulebreaker caught by the computerized system, as Johnson was, there’s a team conforming to the rules and still far behind the competition because they can’t get the car to handle like the driver wants or find a way to coax a little more speed out of the transmission.
Teams used to have a choice on setups they no longer have. They also no longer have the opportunity to ask a NASCAR official in their pit why he made a call. Why? He’s no longer in their pit. Sometimes, he’s no longer a person.
But people also make bad calls. Yellow-line violations are a prime example, as these calls have always been inconsistent and often contradictory to the rule. Does the possibility of a mistake outweigh the positives of human officials?
I’m all for teams having an equal chance to thrive in the sport. But the kind of parity the sport needs doesn’t come from tightly controlling every piece and part or from letting electronics replace people. People and innovation are what made NASCAR. The lack of them are taking it down.
About the author
Amy is an 18-year veteran NASCAR writer and a five-time National Motorsports Press Association (NMPA) writing award winner, including first place awards for both columns and race coverage. As well as serving as Photo Editor, Amy writes The Big 6 (Mondays) after every NASCAR Cup Series race. She can also be found filling in from time to time on The Frontstretch 5 (Wednesdays) and her monthly commentary Holding A Pretty Wheel (Thursdays). A New Hampshire native living in North Carolina, Amy’s work credits have extended everywhere from driver Kenny Wallace’s website to Athlon Sports. She can also be heard weekly as a panelist on the Hard Left Turn podcast that can be found on AccessWDUN.com's Around the Track page.
A daily email update (Monday through Friday) providing racing news, commentary, features, and information from Frontstretch.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.
Wut????????? “The cream of the crop rises to the top in plate racing”!!!!!!!! Are you flucking kidding me??????? Seriously? So the 25 or so cars that were wrecked directly/indirectly by Stinkhouse and a few others WHO ARE THE CREAM OF THE CROP, are not the cream of the crop because they got wrecked out in a wreck fest horrible race? Like ERIK JONES was a true contender in CUP is anywhere near “the cream of the crop”?????? I would say him and Daniel S. have been a disappointment in the JGR stable. Hugely, imo. Hell Jeffery Earnhardt finished 11th! Is ERIK JONES and Jeffery Earnhardt..the “CREAM OF THE CROP”. Oh good God..going out for a midnight walk to “cool down”. One of the most insane BS from AMY in awhile. And she gives some insane “insights”.
I didn’t say it had anything to do with the finishing order. You are right; the best drivers all too often get taken out by others. But it’s refreshing to see drivers like Michael McDowell having great runs when they deserve to. I hate to see the inevitable wrecks but it’s not a bad thing at all to see some different drivers be competitive. Whether or not a driver gets sucked into the crapshoot isn’t necessarily reflective of his super speedway skills.
erik jones won cause truex couldn’t get help. i think the rest of the toyotas were wrecked out.
plate racing is generally whoever survives the mayhem, and my gosh, wasn’t there mayhem on saturday night. the people that won on saturday were the wrecker drivers and clean up crews.
and why did na$car not red flag the race when so many wrecked with only 6 laps to go? they could had possibly avoided the second g/w/c from having to red flag it and going into overtime when there was wrecking on the first g/w/c.
when all the under funded teams finish in the top 15, you know it’s a bad race. they were fortunate enough to be far enough in the back when the mayhem broke out int he middle and front of the field during the night.
NASCAR is so obsessed with Dale Earnhart Jr. nothing else matters. It’s hard to watch a race with the TV muted which is what I did. FOX is not much better with the Waltrips and Jeff Gordon. The best commentator there ever was is Eli Gold on the old radio network MRN. It was also good to see Chase Elliott wreck out too, hope he never wins. All these spoiled rich kids coming in are further killing an already dying sport. People need to understand that not everyone worships anyone named Earnhart… dead or alive.
richard – even thought he’s not racing he’s’ featured in some pre-race stuff. last week was the “slide job”……who knows what next week will be.
when he and burton are in booth, i find it difficult to differentiate between their voices….both sound the same to me.
these broadcasters need to watch some old espn coverage of nascar races, ned and benny and dr. jerry punch were awesome.
i was so surprised they didn’t rush to declare that dayton was jeffrey earnhardt’s best finish in the post-race coverage. but then again, he doesn’t drive a toyota.
I agree with kb. This was Amy’s BS at its max! There was no “cream rising to the top” in this race. It was utter mayhem, caused by incompetent drivers like Stenhouse, Byron and Wallace. Byron and Wallace may improve, but right now they do not belong in the Cup Series. Fans love to bash Cup drivers who dip down into NXS, but I find it more offensive that incompetent backmarkers are allowed to race in Cup and determine not only the outcome of the races, but also the championship. In fact, Saturday’s race was proof that lack of money DOES equal lack of talent in racing. The backmarkers are underfunded for a reason – they just aren’t that good. If there is a certain skill to plate racing, it only lies in being lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time.
I knew before I even read this article that it would be more of Amy’s BS in praise of plate racing and parity. Sure, if you eliminate half the field and most of the top drivers, some marginal drivers and downright BAD drivers will have good finishes. Apparently that is all Amy wants from racing, along with as many wrecks as possible. She cares nothing for skilled racing, only for the excitement and bloodlust of watching millions of dollars of equipment ruined and lives put at risk.
This race only proved once again that plate racing adds nothing to the sport beyond the demo derby factor. Adding it to more tracks will spell more carnage and REDUCE the ability of the cream to rise to the top. It is pretty hard for that cream to rise when it’s sitting on a wrecker. But Amy just doesn’t get it and never will. It’s not refreshing to see Michael McDowell and Jeffrey Earnhardt at the front of the pack. It’s scary and ludicrous and a good reason to pound the final nail into the coffin that calls itself NASCAR.
Amy and Ricky are both about equally competent at what they do – and they should both be out of a job.
IF you are capable of carrying on an adult conversation with our spewing vitriol, I’d like to hear your thoughts on what makes an excellent driver–consistency of lines, ability to adapt to adversity, car control, all of the above? None of the above? Only winning? If you can keep it civil, I’d like to hear it.
I find it funny that you think I like super speedway racing. I never have and have written that often. I do like that some skilled drivers (like McDowell, or did you never see what he could do in a good car) have a chance to have the finishes they deserve, but not a fan of the giant crapshoot. Eliminate the top drivers or not, there are some good ones who can run with them. You hate anyone without the money to be competitive. I get that. Who do you think is capable of coming in and turning those smaller teams around, since all it takes is a better driver and the money will be rolling in?
Car control would be at the top of my list. A controlled passion for winning would be second. But again, note the word “controlled.” The previous week’s race showed the difference between controlled passion and reckless passion, but Larson has plenty of time to learn control to go along with his obvious talent and passion. The ability to win at any kind of track (plate tracks excluded) would be third on my list. Kyle Busch is already there, as are Kevin Harvick and Jimmie Johnson at his best, as well as Martin Truex. No one else even comes close to these five. The Penske drivers have their moments but lack the consistent excellence of the others. Same with SHR. The rest of the teams are field fillers and should just concentrate on staying out of the way.
As for who will turn the smaller teams around, I don’t consider that a valid question, since the sport already has enough super teams and doesn’t need the backmarkers at all. I would like to see them eliminated from Cup racing altogether. If you can’t pay the price of admission, you don’t get to be part of the show.
McDowell had his chance with JGR and blew it, so his occasional flashes of competence don’t impress me.
And I reiterate my point that if Cup drivers should stay out of the lower series, sub-standard drivers should stay out of the Cup Series. And much as you protest, you are ALWAYS the first in line to defend plate racing and even wish to see it expanded to other tracks. There is no defense for plate racing. It destroys the integrity of the sport and turns it into Crazy Al’s Saturday Night Demo Derby.
Upon further review, I will change my second quality of great driving to “controlled aggression.” Passion implies emotion, aggression implies action, which is really what I am talking about here, since most drivers seem to have some degree of “passion” for winning. I know no one at FS ever edits anything they post, but I like to be exact and precise. Must be the result of my own career and that of my parents. (Law and journalism, respectively.)
I still think they should paint a line on plate tracks (exit of 4 at Daytona, center of the tri-oval at Talladega). On the white flag lap once you pass that line, you can use all the asphalt. There would be no need to make a “judgment call” coming to the line and coming the line on the last lap there is no worry about unsafe blending in the corners.
All I have to say is when does blocking begin? The race was less than half over and the drivers(?) were blocking like it was down to last laps.
This race (?) was not entartaining if you like racing. The cars have become so safe that drivers will risk any move and not suffer any consiquences as far as getting hurt. I saw several crashes that were more severe than the one that claimed Dales life. I/m all for safety but the drivers lack of concern crashing cars has gone too far. How many dollars were wasted Saturday because of drivers lack of concern? Don’t want to hear owners crying about money when you have a mess like last Saturday.
Kb is right, no cream left to ride after danica jr takes all the cream out in his first 2 of 4 nitwttedness. He now thinks he is a master of plate racing. How many years in Cup with only two wins. He slammed Almirola in the side on a straight away. Bubba, the half white guy never won a Busch race so why is he in Cup racing ! Oh yeah. Will danica jr have 2 wins after a 20 year career in Cup like elliot Sadler did.
i think they should race on a figure 8 next would have less wrecking …i cant watch this!!