Race Weekend Central

2-Headed Monster: Should NASCAR Start the Season in May or Do They Need To Wait?

The COVID-19 pandemic has put this country at a standstill, including NASCAR. The decision to go racing, whenever that is going to be will be controversial. This week it was being reported that NASCAR is considering a return to racing, with no fans in the stands by the end of May. The race everyone is pointing to is the Coca-Cola 600 at Charlotte Motor Speedway. That race is scheduled for Sunday night on May 24.

If that is indeed NASCAR’s target, is the decision too soon? With the facts that we know about the disease, is NASCAR rushing their way back and should they race by the end of May? Should they wait until they are 100% sure that everyone will be safe before even announcing they are going to return? Or is it still too early to tell? Our writers Adam Cheek and Vito Pugliese debate.

Play the Waiting Game

Race weekends require an incredible team effort to make events go off without a hitch. NASCAR officials, pit crews, drivers, spotters and track staff are all needed to keep everything that goes on during race weekend running smoothly and efficiently.

The coronavirus pandemic has thrown a monkey wrench into all of that. Possibilities have been thrown around with the season on hold of how to bring back NASCAR – whether it’s races without fans or other methods of reducing potential spread of the virus.

Charlotte Motor Speedway and Texas Motor Speedway have been hotspots of recent debate for this – lawmakers in North Carolina want the Coca-Cola 600 to go on as planned next month and Texas governor Greg Abbott is reportedly working with NASCAR on a potential return date in the Lone Star State. Darlington Raceway has also been pitched as a venue of return.

All of this is way too soon, especially with the current state of things – the graph of new cases courtesy of the New York Times has begun to steady itself, but there are factors including false negative tests and unknown cases that make knowing the virus’ true trends damn near impossible.

On one hand, I understand the impact this has had on teams, particularly the smaller ones – layoffs, furloughs and general lack of work at the moment has hit them hard.

But nothing is a safe bet until this begins to take a downward turn. I’m not saying they should wait until a vaccine is developed and distributed, because with the right precautionary steps it’s entirely possible to begin a return to some semblance of normalcy. However, the biggest risk is a second wave of the virus – it’s not even close to being over yet, and pulling the trigger on a return could send us all back into quarantine and make things worse.

Taking a page from my fellow Frontstretchians, I’ll provide an example alluded to by our own Michael Finley and Bryan Nolen. Say Bubba Wallace walks into the garage to get in his car. A crew member, who hasn’t seen him in a while, absentmindedly reaches out for a handshake, and Wallace doesn’t think twice about doing the same.

No one is safe from the effects of coronavirus, although the severity might vary for different ages and conditions. So, Wallace might recover, but if he happens to see Richard Petty the following week and shakes his hand, it’s possible he might not be as lucky. A morbid example? Certainly. But it’s entirely possible, and the same goes for anyone of any age in the sport, especially the older owners and associates.

It’s too much of a risk to even try to go back racing. I miss NASCAR as much as anyone, believe me – not writing about it week to week has left a huge void, and several of us, including myself, would’ve been at Richmond Raceway for the races last weekend. However, lives and well-being need to be paramount when compared to entertainment and events. – Adam Cheek

The First Step is The Hardest

As stay-at-home orders are nearing their respective deadlines throughout the country, several states have been discussing loosening restrictions for travel and work. Georgia is leading the way this week, with South Carolina and North Carolina working to follow suit. Rumblings in recent days have shifted from talking about when we might be able to go back racing, to what needs to be set in place so we can go racing in the next few weeks.

While hope isn’t a strategy, it does help provide a much-needed emotional and psychological lift in the short term. The last two weeks have been a bummer when it comes to seeing NASCAR in the news, for something that had nothing to do with racing, and picked a 60-year-old scab that maybe was starting to heel. However, we might be at the point where it’s time to start identifying what steps we can take to allow an event to take place.

The logistics of putting on a race itself is a monumental task, one that after so many years we’ve taken for granted. If you’ve ever been able to wander the garage area on Friday morning when it opens for inspection and first practice, it’s a pretty bustling place. The haulers are sandwiched in, less than the six-foot social distance guidelines state, even at some of the larger facilities. Team members filing in behind one another, rolling toolboxes, unloading the trailers, preparing for three days in close proximity among 40 teams. Even walking around is a chore when you get to the area where the TV trucks are, with miles of cables and the small army of production staff and on-air talent to bring the show to the millions watching or listening from afar.

Oh, and everyone in the media center too.

Now, start to strip away who is “essential” to make a weekend work, and to do so within Phase Two – or even Phase One – of the CDC guidelines that were rolled out last week. NASCAR has always operated under the premise that the fans are what make the sport work and as the drivers have always maintained, “if it wasn’t for the fans, we wouldn’t be here!”

Well, guess who isn’t going to be there? Sorry fans, you’re going to have to sit these first few out at home.

Which, in the grand scheme of things, probably not a bad idea and a bit of a self-fulfilling prophecy. As things are, a lot of fans probably aren’t up for risking contact or crowds. Financially, it’s probably going to be a stretch for a bit too. The salary reductions and furloughs that NASCAR is working through are the same ones that impact the bottom of line of almost everyone in the country right now. Limiting exposure as much as possible would need to be a requirement, and limiting travel is obviously part of that. Even if half of what we’ve come to expect as a normal crowd size were to show up, that’s still upwards of 25,000 people.

The length of the events is another consideration. NASCAR’s typical three-day tour should be whittled down to one if possible. Charlotte Motor Speedway and Darlington are being considered for first events – possibly as soon as May 22, as competitors are lobbying for locations within driving distance of Charlotte, N.C. where virtually all of the teams are based, as reported by Adam Stern of the Sports Business Journal earlier this week. While the Indianapolis 500 and Monaco Grand Prix have been pushed back to August, the Coca-Cola 600 on Memorial Day weekend might end up being something a bit shorter, and a week later – again, without fans. Now, Charlotte does have those seats painted to look like fans, so it’ll look like the iRacing on TV that everyone has been subjected to the last few weeks. But it will be actual live action on TV.

Remember the last time that happened in 1979 with a captive audience? It propelled the sport from a regional underground niche sport to being the staple of burgeoning cable networks and live network exposure.

This is not to suggest that’s going to happen again – and under no circumstance would I ever remotely suggest we put lives in peril to do so. Yes, there are precautions that need to be taken, not unlike many are becoming used to. Having your temperature taken prior to entering a health clinic, wearing protective gloves and masks (both of which should be staples of any race team for body work), coupled with appropriate distancing and disinfecting of the work area. Keep in mind we’re still a month or so out from it even happening, and a sufficient number of testing kits should be available by then to screen competitors in the garage area. All of this is preliminary – and a month away at the earliest. A lot can change either for the good – or if it’s determined we’re not where we need to be.

Or things have possibly even deteriorated to the point where it just isn’t going to happen.

Barring any further state of emergency declarations or legal actions, the competitors of course have the ultimate say. If the drivers or team owners refuses to subject themselves to the environment, it’s likely not going to be one hold out; there will be several that don’t feel it’s prudent. NASCAR isn’t going to hold a race with 20 cars in the field. Keep in mind this is a sport that runs solely on the principles of other people’s money. If sponsors don’t want to be associated with bad actors, they will more than make the feelings felt in the most impactful way possible. McDonald’s, Credit One Bank and Chevrolet proved that out last week over one awful word that was blurted out during a video game.

When examining the path back for NASCAR to resume, let’s not conflate going racing in a month with what going racing meant three months ago. It’s going to remarkably different and probably not recognizable. The potential for a reduction of race length would not be unprecedented. Races were shortened by 50 miles during the fuel crisis in 1974. There might be scheduled, or alternating pit stops to limit activity on pit road, or the elimination of pit stops all together. Do they park the haulers outside and push the cars in one at a time? It’s going to be an adjustment and not like anything we’ve seen in recent memory.

I want to remain optimistic and believe it can happen and be done successfully. Nobody wants to see anyone put at risk of falling ill with what has led to the death of 40,000 people so far in our country. It would do everyone well if it can be done safely and serve as the model for other sports to follow suit when the time is right for their respective teams and players to take the field. For NASCAR to enjoy something positive and step back into national prominence as a leader in the industry would be perhaps the biggest lift the sport has received in the last 20 years. – Vito Pugliese

About the author

Clayton has been writing NASCAR for the last seven years and has followed the sport for as long as he can remember. He's a Jersey boy with dreams of hoping one day to take his style south and adding a different kind of perspective to auto racing.

Sign up for the Frontstretch Newsletter

A daily email update (Monday through Friday) providing racing news, commentary, features, and information from Frontstretch.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bruce Smith

You said, “NASCAR officials, pit crews, drivers, spotters and track staff are all needed to keep everything that goes on during race weekend running smoothly and efficiently.” So their lives don’t matter to anyone? We put their lives at risk so we can sit on the couch and watch another race? If you follow NASCAR haven’t you seen about a million races on TV by now? I think I have.

These stupid GOP Governors that want to start opening things back up right now need to be recalled!

Bill B

I believe everything is going to have to start back up soon. When our only choice is to take a risk with the virus which may kill us sometime in the future or be homeless and hungry tomorrow, there isn’t much choice. These people that think the government can keep printing money and send checks out indefinitely with nothing being produced are idiots.

We can’t let our policy be dictated with the premise of minimizing the people that die. We have to find a middle ground that, like in any war (and that’s what this is), defines some acceptable amount of losses in order to keep everything from crumbling to the ground.

Maybe those track workers will be glad to be back to work and making money because they have run out of money and don’t want to lose their house. It’s time for everyone to get real about this virus deal. People are going to die no matter what, they already are. We can’t barricade ourselves in our houses indefinitely. When people start being evicted, not being able to afford the basic necessities they will demand to be allowed to work (its starting to happen now). When people can’t find the basic necessities of life because no one is working to produce them, they will demand to be allowed to work. It’s just a matter of time before the scale tips because people’s fear of having nothing will outweigh their fear of getting sick. What would happen the grocery stores closed tomorrow or if there was no food because there was no one to harvest it, package it and transport it. You’d have a choice, die of starvation today or maybe die from covid 19. Not much of a choice but that’s what may be facing.

No one wants to die an no one wants to see someone in their family die but what we are doing now is unsustainable for any length of time. Hopefully, what we’ve done over the last month is allowed the wheels of industry to start mobilizing for what could be a long war; more masks, gloves, hand sanitizer, respirators, hospital beds, etc.. Anyone who thinks this can continue until there is a vaccine is bonkers and doesn’t understand how the world works.

So Mr. Smith, what do you think the long term plan should be? Covid 19 ain’t going anywhere. It will be around for the foreseeable future. What’s your long term plan?



Big Tex

Bill B,

Someone smarter than me came up with a solution and it only results in 3000 more dead.

Go pick up Forbes Magazine and use their list of billionaires. There’s about 3000, and we kill them and take their money. Frees up about $8 trillion.

We can buy the best healthcare on the planet. Retire debt, too.

Does this sound macabre or okay to you? Because guess who’t telling you to get back to work & make their money?

3000 dead vs 4000 per day. Think about it.

Bill B

How would that get rid of the Corona virus? Most likely we would end up with 3000 dead AND 4000 per day. You can pour all the money you want on it and it still won’t guarantee the virus can be controlled.

Sounds more like you are using the virus as an excuse to justify your own selfish, warped agenda.

BTW, if you took that 8 trillion dollars and divide it by 300 million (the current population of the US) that would be about $26,000 per person (if my math is correct). I doubt that amount of money would solve everyone’s issues. So it might sound good on paper, but it’s really just a load of bullshit when you actually drill down on it.

Bill B

Oh yeah, the only reason that the person that came up with that brilliant idea was smarter than you, is because they came up with something that would sound good to the masses, and you just sucked it up and bought it without really giving it much thought.


I agree with you, Bill B. I am sorry for people who have become sick and for those who have died or who have lost people they love, but having the entire country shut down indefinitely and people having no jobs, no income and going hungry is not the answer either.


You can hide in your house under your blankey for the rest of your life if you want, if you have a house or a blankey. The state will own own our homes, and we will have the privilege to live in it, if the state decides you can. There is no vaccine for aids, sars, or swine flue. By the way all these diseases had Dr Fauci in charge. How did that work out?


people here in GA are arguing cause the governor is starting to open the state back up.

personally, i see where it comes down to personal responsibility. if you don’t feel safe, or are a high risk, you need to do what’s best for you. i’m high risk cause of my age and i have asthma. i take precautions to go to grocery store and to work. i can’t stop my life. but i know when i’m pushing it.

even without fans in the stands there are a lot of people at the track when the race is on. i can’t imagine crews social distancing during pit stops. a big thing is first responders. could the communities where tracks are spare the first responders to work a race? i’d think if those people had down time, they’re want to sleep and recharge.

most of the food/beverage concessions are organizations that are there to raise money from the sale of hot dogs and sodas.

honestly, unless tickets had already been purchased for a race, i don’t people will be willing to shell out hundreds of dollars to attend race weekend right now.

i think life will never return to the pre-covid19 time, especially until there’s a vaccine. regardless what government says, a vaccine is still 18-24 months out. some things you can’t rush.

i think nascar has to tell the teams, we’re going to race such and such a date, maybe charlotte race over memorial day weekend. so far that’s the only memorial day weekend race that hasn’t been shuttered. they have to get their folks back and get equipment and cars ready. these teams have sat dormant for 2 months now.

regardless what they decide there will be people that don’t agree with it. but just as post-9/11 we have to resume life. government bailouts will only last so long. the debt this country has is insane!

David Edwards

A tough call. It would be much easier if the people involved in the race were making a personal decision that only effected them. Unfortunately it will also effect everyone they come in contact with for days. And as the first writer said sporting events arent essential businesses.

Tough call indeed.


If, and a really big if, NASCAR does start racing again in the next 4-6 weeks there should be substantial changes in an attempt to minimize exposure and have as safe as possible environment. This could look something like this….
NASCAR itself reduces the “weekend” to 2 days at most. practice, qualifying, race one day for one series, clear out the garage and track crews clean and disinfect everything and repeat the following day for Cup. This should allow space for the haulers to be further apart and same for the garages to work on the cars.
NASCAR limits the teams to having say 6-10 people per car. This would be owners, PR folks, mechanics, pit crews, etc. Teams can choose who these are but are only allowed this number for the event. No having some leave and bring in someone else.
Pitting the cars would be a challenge but one way to look at it would be only 4 over the wall, jack, gas, front and rear. The changers are 100% responsible for the tires during the pit stop. Jackman does the “driver” stuff too. Could even get away with 3 but that would be tougher. I would freeze the field and the cars would pit based on odd and even pit numbers not running order. This would allow for more space between cars. Field then lines up based on position at caution provided you were not part of the caution. I would have a caveat to this however, during the pit stop if you go over say 20 seconds, pit stall entry line to pit stall exit line you lose your position but are in front of cars directly involved in the caution. NASCAR may need to do an orange flag (red/yellow) to get the cars lined up without wasting as many laps.
Biggest thing would be the production side. The TV folks, media, etc. How can they be kept safer. The product on TV might improve as some of the fluff, read “non-essential”, features, cut-aways, etc. would not be there.
I still think we are far away from having any sports events happening but I am just a human who is missing sports.



hasn’t some of the non-essential fluff been left at the “studios in charlotte” that they were cutting away to during the race?

hum speaking of the studio in charlotte, haven’t heard too much more about jamie mcmurray going into larson’s ride.

i have a feeling it will be a long paused season for sports fans of any sport.

Share via