Race Weekend Central

Beside the Rising Tide: Seven Up

Is it history in the making?

The thing about history is that it’s typically only clear in retrospect. Quite often history is one of those objects in the rear-view mirror that looms larger than it first appeared.

If Jimmie Johnson claims a seventh NASCAR Sprint Cup Series title in two weeks, he will join just two other drivers in the sport’s history to do so: Richard Petty and Dale Earnhardt. While there was some overlap between the King and the Intimidator (Petty claimed his last title in 1979, the same year Earnhardt won Rookie of the Year honors), Johnson and Earnhardt never ran in the same Cup race. I’d consider Petty as the sport’s biggest star of the 1960s and ’70s, Earnhardt the biggest name of the ’80s and ’90s, and Johnson probably the most visible star of this millennium. There were other successful and impressive drivers in all three eras, but there’s no arguing this trio has served as the faces of the sport in their respective eras.

Since they competed at different times, there’s been some debate as to whether Johnson’s achievements (even absent a seventh championship to date) are comparable to Earnhardt’s and Petty’s. I’m one of the dwindling numbers of NASCAR writers who not only watched all three drivers compete but also have attended races in person when they won. As such, I’ll offer some of my own opinions, words with which you are free to agree or disagree.

As always, your mileage may vary.

I don’t think anyone is trying to downplay or denigrate what Johnson has accomplished in his career. By one measure, Johnson has enjoyed more success than even Earnhardt. He’s won 79 of 541 races he’s run to date, or 14.62 percent of those races. Earnhardt scored 76 Cup victories in 676 starts, or 11.84 percent of the events he ran. But Petty trumps them both, with a 16.89 percent score.

(Photo: Nigel Kinrade/NKP)
Jimmie Johnson is focused in on winning a potential historic seventh Cup title at Homestead later this month. (Photo: Nigel Kinrade/NKP)

In the prime of his career, Earnhardt once scored at least one win in each of 15 consecutive seasons. Johnson recently equaled that mark; he could add to that streak with a single win next year. Johnson has also won at least three Cup races in every season he’s run a full-time schedule. Those numbers still lag behind Petty, a driver who managed to win at least one top division NASCAR race in 18 consecutive seasons.

Of course, some will argue that Petty had a lot more chances because back in the day NASCAR ran a lot more races than the 36 that make up the modern schedule. As an example, Petty competed in 61 of 62 events in 1964, the year he won his first title. Yes, that meant Petty had a lot of opportunities to win races, but imagine the wear and tear on both driver and machine when the circuit often ran eight or nine races a month. In fact, NASCAR ran Grand National races on Aug. 21, 22 and 23 that year.

Others claim that Petty had an advantage in that he drove for the best team of the era (though my guess is some Wood Brothers fans would dispute that.) Certainly Petty Engineering, as it was known then was a top outfit. The team had already scored three championships with family patriarch Lee Petty at the wheel. (Neatly enough, Lee’s last title in 1959 coincided with son Richard winning Rookie of the Year honors.)

Back in the factory era when the big three (OK, big two; GM elected to sit out the game at least on paper) dominated the sport, Petty Engineering was the lead Plymouth team most years. Once the factories packed their bags and left, Petty was among the first drivers to land a big-money sponsor. It was a long-term relationship with STP, one that continued until his retirement in 1992 and then remained intact with him as an owner.

You could argue, then that Petty had an advantage with Mopar and then STP backing him for most of his career; that gave him more money and, in theory better equipment. But here’s a valid counterargument to that: Plymouth and STP chose to align themselves with Petty Engineering because the team was simply the best in the sport.

Earnhardt had a bit rockier road getting to the Cup Series without a family team to help him along. The Intimidator made nine Cup starts between 1975-78, with the only notable result a fourth-place result at Atlanta Motor Speedway driving for Rod Osterlund in ’78. That convinced Osterlund to offer Earnhardt a full-time ride in 1979. Earnhardt won that year at Bristol Motor Speedway, capturing the victory in just his 16th Cup start and claimed Rookie of the Year honors. Despite missing four races with injuries, Earnhardt finished seventh in that year’s standings. He won the title with the same team in 1980.

In 1981, Osterlund’s team collapsed financially and Earnhardt wound up finishing the season driving for Richard Childress Racing. At the end of the season, Childress told Earnhardt to seek a ride elsewhere; his team simply wasn’t good enough to give a championship driver the rides he deserved. Both men agreed down the road they’d pair up again, and in fact they became lifelong friends.

In 1982 and ’83, Earnhardt ran two largely forgettable seasons for Bud Moore (driving Fords, no less) and scored only three wins. In 1984, Earnhardt returned to Childress’s team, slid behind the wheel of the No. 3 Chevy and the rest… is history.

While the outfit was obviously very good, it’s hard to call it the best team of that era, at least initially. At that point, Junior Johnson’s team was tops on the circuit; that is, until RCR came along and knocked Johnson out of the top spot. Earnhardt’s driving talent, noticed by Childress and perfected by their partnership lifted the team from also-ran to contender. Perhaps more than either Petty or Johnson, it was Earnhardt and his skill at the wheel that made his team the best in the sport.

Johnson was blessed to get tapped for a ride with Hendrick Motorsports, an organization that was used to winning titles, and has again been blessed in that he’s been with the same team and even crew chief his entire career. As of late, Joe Gibbs’ fleet of Toyotas might be running stride for stride with HMS for honors as the top team in the sport, but the fact we’re even having this discussion indicates HMS isn’t quite dead yet.

Petty scored his seven titles in a 15-year period between 1964-79. Earnhardt achieved the same goal in 14 years between 1980-94. While Petty finished 14th or worse in the points in his last eight seasons, Earnhardt was runner-up twice more in the points after that 1994 championship. (He was also runner-up in 1989.) Only Johnson managed five straight Cup titles, though Petty did win championships in four of five years between 1971-75. Earnhardt did the same in a five-year stretch between 1990-94. Between 1986-94, Earnhardt won six titles, finished second and third in the points and had one off year (1992) when he finished 12th in the standings.

Johnson is not universally liked among fans and perhaps isn’t given the respect he deserves. Older fans may recall that Earnhardt wasn’t universally loved when he started winning races either. If Earnhardt had legions of fans, he also had a ton of detractors who considered him a dirty-driving barbarian. As for Petty, it was before my time but I’m told not everyone expected much of the “King” when he first started racing either. Fans of that era didn’t think he was tough enough to compete with the likes of Joe Weatherly. Curtis Turner, Buck Baker and, yeah, his old man, Lee Petty. Again, history typically adds perspective.

The three drivers in question come from remarkably different eras of sports history and became household names through different channels. With Petty, it was a segment on CBS’s 60 Minutes. Earnhardt entered America’s living rooms via ESPN and the cable TV revolution during the growth years. Johnson, through no fault of his own, is a product of the FOX era of NASCAR broadcasting, one that has hit the sport below the waterline as far as ratings and race attendance even as Darrell Waltrip all but sings love sonnets to the six-time champion.

(Photo: Brett Moist/NKP)
Jimmie Johnson may be closing in on seven titles but he won’t come close to Richard Petty’s (right, with Aric Almirola) record-setting 200 Cup Series wins. (Photo: Brett Moist/NKP)

In a way, it’s odd there was so little overlap between the primes of these three legendary drivers and other superstars of the sport. Petty was champion in 1979, but he never won another title after Earnhardt won his first in 1980. Earnhardt was champion in 1994 but never won another crown after Jeff Gordon won his first title in 1995. Gordon won his last championship in 2001, the year Earnhardt was killed at Daytona International Speedway, and his success quickly deteriorated even as Johnson’s star rose.

So in the end, Petty, Earnhardt and Johnson have all achieved remarkable things in the sport and should be celebrated as such. But in my mind, at least Petty has always been and always will be the King. He, after all, won 200 Cup-level races, more than Earnhardt and Johnson combined. Petty won 27 of those races in a single season (1967) and 10 were scored consecutively.

Finally, drivers in Petty’s era had to be more versatile. The series ran on short tracks, both dirt and paved. It ran on the superspeedways that would come to dominate the modern schedule particularly in their 1.5-mile, moderately-banked configuration that dumbs down the sport, in my eyes. Petty ran and won on quarter-mile, high-banked ovals, road courses (including a dirt road course, if you can believe it). He won seven Daytona 500s between 1964-81 (the debut of the “little cars.”) The King won 15 times at Martinsville Speedway and led 27,891 laps there in the process. In September 1970, Petty won at Raleigh, N.C., in what has turned out to be the last Cup-level dirt track race. Petty won his first Cup race on Feb. 28, 1960, and his last on July 4, 1984.

So while they say all records will eventually be broken, I very much doubt some of those marks ever will be. And, as such there is no question as to who the greatest driver in our sport is and remains.

Another possible qualifier, considering a record-tying seventh championship for Johnson certainly can’t be laid at his doorstep: Petty and Earnhardt won all seven of their titles under various points systems that counted the results of the entire season, not the Chase, which rewards prowess in the final 10 races of the year. Under a full-season points system, a disastrous stretch of races like Johnson endured this summer would have ended any chances he’d have had to win that seventh title this season.

Like I said, history sometimes only seems clear in retrospect. For decades, NASCAR’s rich history has been divided into two segments: the modern era (from 1971 on, when Winston signed on as title sponsor and the slate of races run every year was greatly reduced) and the “old days.” But it would seem that there’s now a third era in our sport’s history, one that began in 2004 with Sprint/Nextel taking over as title sponsor and the adoption of the first of the Chase formats to crown a titlist.

What shall we call this post-modern period? My suggestion is the “end game.”

About the author


Matt joined Frontstretch in 2007 after a decade of race-writing, paired with the first generation of racing internet sites like RaceComm and Racing One. Now semi-retired, he submits occasional special features while his retrospectives on drivers like Alan Kulwicki, Davey Allison, and other fallen NASCAR legends pop up every summer on Frontstretch. A motorcycle nut, look for the closest open road near you and you can catch him on the Harley during those bright, summer days in his beloved Pennsylvania.

Sign up for the Frontstretch Newsletter

A daily email update (Monday through Friday) providing racing news, commentary, features, and information from Frontstretch.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Jimmie Johnson will never hold a candle to the greats, and I am not old to be fawning over the elders. It is just a fact. Yes, he won races…but he is still overrated in the bow down and throw rose petals at his feet mindset that some (read media) seem to have. Having him compared to so and so with a 10 race reset as a “Champion” in the same universe as the greats, well it is insulting. Blame Brian with his lame brained “Chase”. IMO.


Petty & Earnhardt didn’t have the backing of mega teams & their highly paid engineers, 6DOF simulators, etc. Petty & Earnhardt were blue collar Southerners who looked, talked, and behaved like one of us. Johnson is a pretty boy yankee; though he seems like a nice enough person. Johnson’s titles all should be followed with an asterisk and a mea culpa about the ridiculous chase.


Matt builds a good case for Petty and I have to agree. The only thing I would add is that Johnson has faced a deeper field of competition. But whether your racing 8 strong cars or 28 it still a well earned victory in NASCAR.

I think Johnson does deserve to be mentioned among the greats. And I give him 3rd place with room to move up. He does NOT toot his own horn and comes across as humble. When the 48 is on the track, you are not surprised when he starts moving up and challenging for the win. That is greatness.


championship won over the course of an entire season, but it 60 races a year or 36 a year, is not the same as the new chase format in whatever tweaked way it’s presented annually. and now the the waivers, not the same. the “cars” and equipment aren’t the same. heck earnhardt had the era of the lumina to overcome. now they’re more iroc inspired cars.

last i checked you can’t compare apples and oranges. now of course na$car will find a way to do it it as they really need to tout a “7 time champion” in the new era to try to put interest back in the sport. i honestly, don’t see johnson winning #7 this year. i have a feeling it will be a gibbs car. maybe this is cousin carl’s year if kyle doesn’t advance this weekend.

Bill B

Waste of time to discuss this or think too hard about it.


I can never compare Johnson to the greats of the past simply due to the Chase. All his championships have come from the Chase and never a season long champion. In my opinion he wins only 2 or 3 at most if it was over a full season. Taking races off during the season and still becoming champion over the final 10 races of the year just doesn’t sit well with me.

While his number of wins is impressive, I also can’t help but think how many times he was aided in those wins due to lucky dogs, wave arounds and Nascar conveniently throwing cautions to help him. I can’t even put Johnson ahead of guys like Stewart and Gordon, no matter how many Chase championships he wins. To put him ahead of guys like Earnhardt, Petty, Pearson et al is a joke.


Good points and true. I do believe also Stewart and Gordon are way ahead of him.

PattyKay Lilley

Yep! What you said right there at the end is perfect. Trying to compare the eras in which those three drove isn’t apples and oranges, but more like bananas and kangaroos… just too different to be compared. That “end game” thing though, should get you a Pulitzer, my friend.


Bananas vs. Kangaroos … LOL!!


It was Junior Johnson who told Childress to get out of his car and let Earnhardt drive it. Bur. like you said, the car wasn’t good enough the first time, and for a while the second time.


When Johnson gets in the 47 and wins I might change my opinion of him a little.


I agree that the difference between the era’s makes direct comparison impossible. However I do think that the “chase era” or End Game as Matt so eloquently puts it is in a totally different category. Winning championships over full seasons is different than over 10 races as so many of Johnson’s trophies were won and now the elimination format adds the crapshoot component to it.

If Johnson wins it, NASCAR and Johnson’s fans will be ecstatic. The rest of us probably just don’t care as much at all.


All three have one thing in common. They were the most successful stock car drivers of an era, but lacked wins in other disciplines. Certainly not the diverse skills of a Foyt, Hurtibise, Andretti, or Stewart, to name a few.


Banned by the


… … to throw another “numbers” out there … in 1964, Richard drove in 61 of 62 races, but the one race he missed was the OTHER 100 mile qualifier for the Daytona 500 … so, Richard drove in EVERY race in which he was eligible … … … also, during the year, he drove two races in the #42 … eight in the #41 … and the rest in his #43 … … I am sure they were physically three different cars — and would not be surprised if they were the only three cars in the Petty Enterprises stable! Once Earnhardt had finally landed a “major ride” … and for all of Jimmie Johnson’s career … they have never been in a position of not having a race-ready and winnable car all set to jump in and drive! In his early years, who’s to say how many times Richard was driving a car that probably less than desirable … and when exactly did Petty Enterprises have a “modern day fleet of cars?” Certainly not by 1970 … as in his famous Darlington crash … he was in the Road Runner — because he had already wrecked the Superbird — and they rushed the Road Runner to the track … the only two cars they had!

Richard won seven titles with six different point systems … 1964 and 1967 were very similar — basically, champion was whomever won the most money, provided you drove a bunch of races (see: Fred Lorenzen and Fireball Roberts) … 1971 and 1972 were very similar — points for high you finished, but bonus points for every lap completed … … 1974 — the “infamous” system of “Money Won x Races Competed x 0.001 = Points Compiled” … … and in 1975 and 1979 with the “Latford System” — the same as with where Earnhardt won all seven of his titles … … and there is the “Chase” years where I am not so sure Jimmie’s six titles were even under the same “Chase rules” … … … …

All I can say is each driver … won a championship in that particular year … under the same system as everyone else that year was competing … … … … so, I have to give them each THAT!

What would be interesting … … from 1949 through 2016 … … recompile each and every season using each and every point system NASCAR has ever utilized! But … even there … the “point system of the day” still influences driving styles over the course of the season … … so, even if Richard and Dale and Jimmie … and every other champion and non-champion could be compared thusly … it still would not be a 100% accurate depiction … … … … they each did and are doing what they did and are doing in their era — and we will just have to be satisfied with that … … … … …

… … … besides … the three greatest drivers ever are still Herb Thomas, Tim Flock, and David Pearson!!!


I am afraid the “End Game” is NASCAR has a King, a Rook, two Bishops, and three Pawns … and all the fans have is a King and a Knight … LOL!!

Share via