Race Weekend Central

Richard Childress Racing Appeal Heard, Fines Reduced

On Thursday afternoon, the National Motorsports Appeal Panel upheld the P5 penalty assessed to Richard Childress Racing’s No. 31 team on March 31, 2015 following the race at Auto Club Speedway. The three-person appeals panel consisted of Mr. John Capels, Mr. Hunter Nickell and Mr. Dale Pinilis. The trio determined that the No. 31 team was in violation of multiple sections of the rulebook but removed the additional 25-point, $50,000 fine assessed for a violation found in post-race inspection “because there is no written explanation of what constitutes a post-race inspection.”

The original penalty of 75 owner and driver points and $125,000 fine have been reduced to 50 owner and driver points and a $75,000 fine. The six-race suspensions for crew chief Luke Lambert, tire technician James Bender and race engineer Philip Surgen were upheld and will begin immediately.

The reduction in the points penalty moves Ryan Newman from 24th to 20th in the Sprint Cup Series standings.

“I’d like to thank the Appeals Panel for taking the time to hear our appeal today,” Childress said in a statement from the team. “While they decided to reduce the penalties to the minimum penalties for a P5 violation, I am disappointed that the entire penalty was not overturned given the facts we presented. In order for the team to move forward, and focus our efforts on the upcoming races, Luke [Lambert], Phil [Surgen] and James [Bender] will begin serving their suspensions this weekend at Bristol. Veteran crew chief Todd Parrott will fill in as crew chief for this weekend’s race. We are still discussing our options and have not yet determined whether to appeal the penalties to the Final Appeals Officer.”

RCR does have the right to appeal Thursday’s decision to the Final Appeals Officer per Section 15 of the NASCAR Rulebook.

The infractions were considered to be a violation of the following sections of the NASCAR Rule Book:

12.1: Actions detrimental to stock car racing

20.16: Wheels and tires

A. Any device, modification, or procedure to the tire or wheel, including the valve stem hardware, that is used to release pressure, beyond normal pressure adjustments, from the tire and/or inner shield, will not be permitted.

20.16.2: Tires

F. Modifications to the tires, by treatment or any other means, will not be permitted.

About the author

Sign up for the Frontstretch Newsletter

A daily email update (Monday through Friday) providing racing news, commentary, features, and information from Frontstretch.com
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Other than the size of the check the penalties meant nothing anyway. If Newman wins a race he’s in the chase regardless of his points standings, and the personnel suspensions are a joke.
The sponsor may feel a little better but otherwise life goes on.

Tommy T.

Despite Newman coming within 1 point of winning the championship last year this reduction in points could potentially be BIG for the #31 team. Sure, were Newman to win a race he would still be Chase-eligible, but that is a big ‘if.’ Neither Newman or any of the other two RCR stable mates have been an odds-on favorite to win in a long, long time. It is more likely that Newman will have to tick off a bunch of top-12 finishes and slowly chip away at getting into the top-16. This twenty-five point giveback will make doing that even more possible.


The entire NASCAR rule book is printed at the bottom of ever contest entry form, “Rules and conditions subject to change without notice”.

Ron Schwalbe

I just wish somebody–ANYBODY – would explain exactly WHAT they did wrong beside saying – “they violated the rule # blah-blah” — which actually describes absolutely NOTHING ! NO details !
Did the inspectors actually find holes drilled in the tires/rims etc – if so – was it -ALL FOUR , -or was simply a pinhole in the tread of one, that was assumed to be an attempt to “cheat” – –
Was Childress arguing that whatEVER they did, – was withIN the rules or – saying that they didn’t do ANYthing- or didn’t do whatever NAscar accused them of ? Arguing that an inadvertent crack in the rim was NOT a planned effort.
Did NASCAR point to something and say –THIS is what we found and if SO – -what WAS that ??
NO ONE has given any details at all- for EITHER side
Lot’s of people are in jail for —“breaking the law” – – some for murder -some for stealing candy – –
Be nice to know what was actually being debated besides – -“they did a “NO_NO” !

Share via