Sunday , September 14 2014
Home / Amy Henderson / The Frontstretch Five: Schedule Changes NASCAR Should Have Made
The Frontstretch Five: Schedule Changes NASCAR Should Have Made
(Credit: CIA)

The Frontstretch Five: Schedule Changes NASCAR Should Have Made

Welcome to the Frontstretch Five, a brand-new column for 2014! Each week, Amy Henderson takes a look at the racing, the drivers, and the storylines that drive NASCAR and produces a list of five people, places, things, and ideas that define the current state of our sport. This week, Amy has five changes NASCAR should have made to the schedule for 2015…

Moving Darlington Raceway back to Labor Day was a great move, but could NASCAR have done better? (Credit: CIA)

Moving Darlington Raceway back to Labor Day was a great move, but could NASCAR have done better? (Credit: CIA)

NASCAR released the 2015 Sprint Cup schedule on Tuesday, and as expected, there were a few changes. NASCAR made absolutely the right call by moving Darlington to the Labor Day weekend date that once made it the longest-running tradition in the sport. Bristol’s later spring date is also a wise move, as the April weather in the mountains is a bit more predictable. With NASCAR entering a new television contract in 2015, this schedule would have been a great opportunity for a complete overhaul of the docket. That didn’t happen, but here are a few of the biggest opportunities the sanctioning body missed.

1. A road course in the last ten races Since NASCAR insists on having just ten races determine the sport’s champion, it stands to reason that those ten races should include at least one road course in that span. Most of the sport’s best can handle the left and right turns, so it would not ruin anyone’s title hopes any more than any other track can, and it would be a test of a different skill set. Road courses are also an equalizer of sorts, where the smaller teams have an equal shot, and that plays into the hands of the Chase underdogs. Watkins Glen in early October, perhaps after New Hampshire, is lovely. There is really no good reason not to include a road course in the championship run. If the title is about the best driver, then the champion should be able to hold his own on any track, including on that features right turns.

2. Atlanta as the season finale In some ways it makes sense to end the season on an intermediate track in that there is less unpredictability than a short track, for example. Atlanta Motor Speedway used to host the finale, and the race was often a pretty good show. AMS is one of the better 1.5-mile tracks in terms of the racing quality, and the season finale needs an upgrade in that department. While early March was a more traditional date for AMS, the track had two races then, and the weather for the spring date can be difficult to work with. AMS has almost always put on a better race than Homestead-Miami Speedway, and it’s closer to home for the road-weary teams. Overall, it’s a better choice for the final race, except for one detail: it’s owned by Bruton Smith and not NASCAR’s sister company International Speedway Corporation. It’s no mystery why NASCAR wants to keep the race at Homestead, because the France family makes more money that way. Which is too bad, because the finale could use an upgrade.

3. Fewer night races The cars look great under the lights, but is night racing all it’s cracked up to be? I don’t think so – nighttime track conditions are more conducive to aero dependence, while during the day, the surface heats up and becomes slick and unpredictable. That’s especially true for some tracks that are hyper-sensitive to temperature changes. Night racing looks pretty, and there’s the illusion of more aggressive racing, but that’s not really the case at most tracks. Racing during the day, with conditions at their least favorable, makes for a better show. Sure, it can be a bit uncomfortable for the fans, but they’ve sat in the stands in summer heat for decades. It’s also harder on drivers, but isn’t that part of the game? Nighttime just isn’t the right time for a lot of tracks to host Sprint Cup races.

4. The final off-week just a bit later The week off between Bristol and Darlington is a welcome change for just about everyone in the sport, but why not have it after the 26th race, before the Chase begins? Better yet, if NASCAR swapped that late break with the Richmond race, the Chase field could be decided by the Lady in Black, in the Southern 500, the race that epitomizes what NASCAR is supposed to be. That would be a great way to end the regular season, and give the Chase teams an equal chance to prepare. The current gap does not do that – while the winners are locked into the Chase, the same can’t be said for others. That means that while the Chase teams are hard at work preparing their cars for the final ten races, the rest are preparing for two more chances to get in. That leaves anyone who does race in or get in on points after the break a week’s disadvantage.

Wider shots, such as the one depicted in this image, could greatly improve the quality of NASCAR broadcasts.

Would returning Talladega to a summertime race be an improvement to the schedule?

5. Talladega in the summer heat Here’s a final nod to the sport’s history…why not return one of Talladega’s races (preferably the one that’s currently in late October) to the gritty heat of high summer? Racing at ‘Dega in the sweltering heat was, like the original Southern 500, a test of both man and machine. It would also remove the crapshoot factor from the Chase, or at the very least, to the beginning of it. As it stands, it leaves the title too much to luck. The most skilled plate racer can be caught in the wrong place for a big wreck. Should the best driver all year be eliminated from title contention while running in the top 5 because someone else makes a mistake? Should a driver who runs at the back all day for points move on in the Chase while one who actually races to win falls victim to the Big One? Sure, it can happen anywhere, but we all know it’s practically guaranteed to happen at Talladega. Moving the race makes the race harder to win, and keeps the title race from turning into a roll of the dice late in the game.

About Amy Henderson

Amy Henderson
Co-Managing Editor of Frontstretch since 2012, Amy oversees the site’s photography and daily content as well as assisting with staff management. A ten-year veteran writer and three-time National Motorsports Press Association (NMPA) writing award winner, Amy pens The Big Six (Mondays), Frontstretch 5 (Wednesdays), Holding A Pretty Wheel (Fridays) and writes a monthly diary with Truck Series driver Brendan Gaughan. A New Hampshire native living in North Carolina, Amy’s work credits extend everywhere from driver Kenny Wallace’s website to Athlon Sports.

8 comments

  1. You want a road course in the Chase, but not a restrictor-plate track? Road courses are a test of man and machine, but Daytona and Talledega are not?

    • You honestly think Daytona and Dega are a test of man? More like a test of luck. There’s little skill to those races. The fact that Danica can lead and do well there or that the underfunded teams can win there show that.

  2. I still don’t understand why they didn’t move the Atlanta race to the end of season and the Homestead race to March. Miami is much more tolerable in March than Atlanta, and it restores a little more tradition to a sport that has spit on it’s heritage for better than a decade.

  3. Amy, I find your columns to be the most knowledgeable and reasoned in the racing press. Though I often disagree with you your writing is always thought provoking. That said, considering the problems with the current product tinkering with the schedule seems to be a case of rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Priorities, priorities, priorities. For example, if NASCAR seriously set about breaking the aero dependence they could put on a better race in a Winn Dixie parking lot. Every poster here could come up with a problem more important right now then the schedule.

  4. Happy that NASCAR FINALLY moved the race at Darlington back to Labor Day. I see there are already lots of articles lining up to make it the responsibility of the fans to now show up in support. Gee, let’s see NASCAR crapped all over the fans for the past 10 years but of course it will be OUR fault if it doesn’t sell out at Darlington, not the fact the the racing or the chase has driven fans away. Sheesh. BTW, I didn’t read Summer’s article, I disagree with her point of view so often it simply isn’t worth it to me so I won’t give her the click or the time of day. I saw the title of Ryan McGee’s column from ESPN and didn’t read that either, but I could pretty much tell what it has to say. I guess I’ve gotten way tired of the blame the fans mentality from writers.

    At any rate, Talladega is still there looming as the destruction of hopes for anyone in the chase. I still think it’s stupid having a RP track in the chase, but NASCAR loves the carnage.

    I agree with you about night races. For instance, one that they could move back to daylight hours is the Charlotte race in October. It gets freaking cold when it gets dark and that isn’t comfortable plus I think the race would be better during the day.

    You are absolutely right, ISC/France family will never let go of their perogatives for where the finale should be – no matter how much sense it makes.

  5. It’s kind of a joke to talk about moving Talladega out of the chase because of it’s crapshoot factor when the whole chase format for determining a champion has raised the crapshoot factor. Personally I agree because I’d like to remove the luck/crapshoot factor as much as possible but that’s not the direction NASCAR has taken for the last 10 years.

  6. The new schedules are yet again a damn joke. Yes, I agree Darlington should be run on Labor Day and I’m glad the buffoons made that change. Unfortunately we are stuck with the same over abundance of 1.5 mile cookie cutters for the forseeable future. I get it, lousy tracks like Kansas, Chicago and Texas are here to stay. However, these same buffoons have hinted for the last couple of years about more changes to the busch and truck series, and what do we get? More of the same. More companion events so the cup drivers can enjoy their playground and add to their trophy case.

    • I agree with what you say on the companion races, but your comment on the Kansas track I’m from the midwest and that is the closest race for me and I will tell you that both of the races in Kansas the seats are pretty full compared to other tracks